Inequality Lamentism

 Walrus Publishing ambivalently presents:

INEQUALITY LAMENTISM

A philoso-passionate text art monster
of WTF compromise between egalitarianism and elitism
with cringe displays of poisonous love

This book offers a new perspective on the project of relieving suffering by means of philosophically informed ideology, one that suggests a calculated compromise between egalitarian and elitist approaches. This new approach, called “inequality lamentism”, rejects the post-modern anti-reason cancel-chaos underpinning most egalitarianism; while also dissuading us against the modernist fetishized over-absolutism behind elitism (i.e., fascism). This can be thought of as an anthem for epistemic meta-modernism and a call for “woke 2.0”.

Of course, the author has no confidence that their inequality lamentism will be taken seriously, and consequently wraps their offering in deep, artfully expressed pessimism.

The ideas and themes are unique, original, passionate, and creatively expressed. But, unfortunately, the execution of their presentation is un-scholarly, often repetitive, and sloppy; owing to the author’s poverty and clinical lethargy. The author thus invites us to consider the book more as a work of text art, or a coded artifact of their psychosis, or both. Either way, prepare for about .368 WTF moments per page.

The format is a somewhat ordered collection of allegorical discourse vignettes (and some poems) wherein you’ll meet such characters as: Instance of Great Suffering, The Omnipotence Twins (Deity and Culture), The Angel of Mereological Nihilism (a challenge to hard AI-based accelerationism), The Demon of Unrequited Love, and The Shrine Keeper at the Great Epistemic Quagmire.

The volume includes an “Appendix for Philosophy Geeks” wherein the author offers a brief snapshot of their takes on metaphysics, epistemology, physicalism vs anti-physicalism, and meta-ethics.

WARNING: Contains sexually vulgar language.


The book features links to external sources for both entertainment and information.

This page is a linked index of those external source links.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro Attempt: Introduction for the Book: Diary of a Person Confused About the Relief of Suffering

Image
Actually written JULY 9, 2013 - [This is the introduction to a book I tried to write years ago, but abandoned as I realized I lack the discipline to complete it.] PROPOSED CHAPTERS 00 Introduction [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 01 Why Relieve Suffering [half complete] 02 What Suffering Is [half complete] [Included here as Suffering Defined and Cataloged ] 03 Objections To Relieving Suffering [complete] 04 Basics Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 05 Politics (or political economy) Of Relieving Suffering [mostly complete] 06 Metaphysics And Epistemology Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 07 Morality And Suffering  [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 08 Ugliness And Suffering [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 09 Anti-Oppression Ideology And Suffering [far from complete] 10 Spirituality And Suffering [never started] 11 Psychology (Psychotherapy) And Suffering [never started] Non-H...
Read more

Physicalism's Ambiguity Problem - Is proving / disproving physicalism even possible?

JANUARY 3, 2024 A writing by Lance S. Bush prompted me to wonder whether either physicalism or non-physicalism could be proved, specifically whether it could be proved to my own personal satisfaction.  The title of this writing suggests that I’m about to challenge physicalism with some kind of problem. I am. But the problem actually cuts both ways, challenging both physicalism and anti-physicalism. I just gave this writing that title because I have a bias against physicalism. My bias also means I will describe the problem mostly in terms of how it challenges physicalism, instead of how it challenges anti-physicalism. And, for all I know, the problem has been solved. Perhaps one of my readers will be kind enough to point me toward the problem’s resolution. So I begin by stating the problem of ambiguity. Given any conscious physical body, I can’t understand how anybody could distinguish between two alternative interpretations of the physical body’s relationship to it’s consciousness...
Read more

Rodrigo Defends Infinity with Existential Overlapping

Actually written JANUARY 21, 2024 A philosophy cohort of mine, Rodrigo Vanegas, presented me with an interesting argument in defense of intrinsic/objective/metaphysically real infinity. So I’ve been thinking about it. Having presented Rodrigo with the problem of how infinity creates self-contradictory gaps in existence, i.e., the problem of metaphysical adjacency , he offered what I here call the “existential overlapping” idea as a way to achieve gapless adjacency and thus “defend” metaphysically real infinity. Rodrigo proposed that two things can be adjacent, without gaps, if we understand the two things as if they occupied ranges on a number-line, wherein Thing-A would occupy locations 0 through 1, and Thing-B would occupy locations 1 through 2. The Things would be adjacent at location-1, and there would be no gaps of self-contradictory nothingness. While I have already considered this idea, Rodrigo’s presentation of the idea prompted me to think about it deeper and to target the ide...
Read more