e47

e47 Mutabaruka with Addictive Fuzz Conspiration – Dis Poem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jADoEwsML4

Warning: strobe flashing effects


Entertainment Links [ e1 through e61 ]

  e1     e2     e3     e4     e5     e6     e7     e8     e9     e10  
  e11     e12     e13     e14     e15     e16     e17     e18     e19     e20  
  e21     e22     e23     e24     e25     e26     e27     e28     e29     e30  
  e31     e32     e33     e34     e35     e36     e37     e38     e39     e40  
  e41     e42     e43     e44     e45     e46     e47     e48     e49     e50  
  e51     e52     e53     e54     e55     e56     e57     e58     e59     e60  
  e61                                      

Infromational Links [ i1 through i27 ]

  i1     i2     i3     i4     i5     i6     i7     i8     i9     i10  
  i11     i12     i13     i14     i15     i16     i17     i18     i19     i20  
  i21     i22     i23     i24     i25     i26     i27              



You can load all Inequality Lamentism external links as one big page here.

But if your device cannot handle all those embedded videos in one page,
you can use this alternative link index page
that presents just links to the videos, rather than embedding them.



Inequality Lamentism book main page

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro Attempt: Introduction for the Book: Diary of a Person Confused About the Relief of Suffering

Image
Actually written JULY 9, 2013 - [This is the introduction to a book I tried to write years ago, but abandoned as I realized I lack the discipline to complete it.] PROPOSED CHAPTERS 00 Introduction [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 01 Why Relieve Suffering [half complete] 02 What Suffering Is [half complete] [Included here as Suffering Defined and Cataloged ] 03 Objections To Relieving Suffering [complete] 04 Basics Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 05 Politics (or political economy) Of Relieving Suffering [mostly complete] 06 Metaphysics And Epistemology Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 07 Morality And Suffering  [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 08 Ugliness And Suffering [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 09 Anti-Oppression Ideology And Suffering [far from complete] 10 Spirituality And Suffering [never started] 11 Psychology (Psychotherapy) And Suffering [never started] Non-H...
Read more

Rodrigo Defends Infinity with Existential Overlapping

Actually written JANUARY 21, 2024 A philosophy cohort of mine, Rodrigo Vanegas, presented me with an interesting argument in defense of intrinsic/objective/metaphysically real infinity. So I’ve been thinking about it. Having presented Rodrigo with the problem of how infinity creates self-contradictory gaps in existence, i.e., the problem of metaphysical adjacency , he offered what I here call the “existential overlapping” idea as a way to achieve gapless adjacency and thus “defend” metaphysically real infinity. Rodrigo proposed that two things can be adjacent, without gaps, if we understand the two things as if they occupied ranges on a number-line, wherein Thing-A would occupy locations 0 through 1, and Thing-B would occupy locations 1 through 2. The Things would be adjacent at location-1, and there would be no gaps of self-contradictory nothingness. While I have already considered this idea, Rodrigo’s presentation of the idea prompted me to think about it deeper and to target the ide...
Read more

Physicalism's Ambiguity Problem - Is proving / disproving physicalism even possible?

JANUARY 3, 2024 A writing by Lance S. Bush prompted me to wonder whether either physicalism or non-physicalism could be proved, specifically whether it could be proved to my own personal satisfaction.  The title of this writing suggests that I’m about to challenge physicalism with some kind of problem. I am. But the problem actually cuts both ways, challenging both physicalism and anti-physicalism. I just gave this writing that title because I have a bias against physicalism. My bias also means I will describe the problem mostly in terms of how it challenges physicalism, instead of how it challenges anti-physicalism. And, for all I know, the problem has been solved. Perhaps one of my readers will be kind enough to point me toward the problem’s resolution. So I begin by stating the problem of ambiguity. Given any conscious physical body, I can’t understand how anybody could distinguish between two alternative interpretations of the physical body’s relationship to it’s consciousness...
Read more