Picture of Ideological Conflict

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro Attempt: Introduction for the Book: Diary of a Person Confused About the Relief of Suffering

Image
Actually written JULY 9, 2013 - [This is the introduction to a book I tried to write years ago, but abandoned as I realized I lack the discipline to complete it.] PROPOSED CHAPTERS 00 Introduction [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 01 Why Relieve Suffering [half complete] 02 What Suffering Is [half complete] [Included here as Suffering Defined and Cataloged ] 03 Objections To Relieving Suffering [complete] 04 Basics Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 05 Politics (or political economy) Of Relieving Suffering [mostly complete] 06 Metaphysics And Epistemology Of Relieving Suffering [half complete] 07 Morality And Suffering  [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 08 Ugliness And Suffering [nearly complete] - [Included in this book] [I mean, this blog ] 09 Anti-Oppression Ideology And Suffering [far from complete] 10 Spirituality And Suffering [never started] 11 Psychology (Psychotherapy) And Suffering [never started] Non-H...
Read more

Rodrigo Defends Infinity with Existential Overlapping

Actually written JANUARY 21, 2024 A philosophy cohort of mine, Rodrigo Vanegas, presented me with an interesting argument in defense of intrinsic/objective/metaphysically real infinity. So I’ve been thinking about it. Having presented Rodrigo with the problem of how infinity creates self-contradictory gaps in existence, i.e., the problem of metaphysical adjacency , he offered what I here call the “existential overlapping” idea as a way to achieve gapless adjacency and thus “defend” metaphysically real infinity. Rodrigo proposed that two things can be adjacent, without gaps, if we understand the two things as if they occupied ranges on a number-line, wherein Thing-A would occupy locations 0 through 1, and Thing-B would occupy locations 1 through 2. The Things would be adjacent at location-1, and there would be no gaps of self-contradictory nothingness. While I have already considered this idea, Rodrigo’s presentation of the idea prompted me to think about it deeper and to target the ide...
Read more

Utilitarian Court of the Uber Trolley Problem

Actually written DECEMBER 23, 2025 This dialog vignette was meant to go into my book called Inequality Lamentism . But I withheld it because I could not come to a resolution. Anyway, here it is:   The bailiff: “The Utilitarian Court of the Uber Trolley Problem is now in session, the honorable judge Mercy Retribution presiding. “Judge Retribution will now hear the case of the Angel of Socialism versus the Demon of Accelerationism. Both have mutually accused one another of murder, as measured in caused deaths, and the deliberate aggravation of misery, as measured in caused Siuian dukkhas.” [R. G. Sui's "dukkha" as unit of measure for misery: https://robertdaoust.org/syst-study/panetics/amsiu.html ]   Judge Retribution: “Will the two defendants approach the bench.” They do.   Judge Retribution: “I have reviewed the dynamics of this case and have consented to a ruling by this court, as our mission is to try cases in which the matter is not one of guilt, but the degree o...
Read more